Рус | Eng

Архив

 

Серия "Труды конференций"

  • История предпринимательства в России: XIX — начало XX века. Вып. 3. Сб. статей  / Под ред. А. Л. Дмитриева, А. А. Семенова; Научно-исследовательский ин-т менеджмента СПбГУ. — СПб: Издат. дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2007. — 576 с.
  • История предпринимательства в России: XIX — начало XX века. Вып. 2. Сб. статей  / Под ред. А. Л. Дмитриева, А. А. Семенова; Научно-исследовательский ин-т менеджмента СПбГУ. — СПб: Издат. дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2006. — 448 с.
  • Реформирование общественного сектора: поиск путей повышения эффективности. Сб. статей в 2 ч. / Под ред.И. Н. Баранова, Т. М. Скляр, Ю. В. Федотова; Научно-исследовательский ин-т менеджмента СПбГУ. — СПб: Издат. дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2006. — 776 с.
  • История предпринимательства в России: XIX – XX века: Сб. статей / Под ред. А.Л. Дмитриева, А.А. Семенова; Научно-исследовательский институт менеджмента СПбГУ. – СПб.: Издат. Дом СПбГУ, 2005.



Серия "Научные доклады"

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
           
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 

 

 

2016 год

 

#1 (E)–2016

E.K. Zavyalova, D.G. Kucherov, S.V. Kosheleva, R.R. Fisyuk, V.S. Tsybova, A.I. Alsufyev. Human Resource Management in Successful European Multinational Enterprises during the Economic Crisis. Working Paper #1(E)–2016.

Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Key words and phrases: human resource management, performance, multinational enterprise, economic crisis.

Abstract: The main goal of the present research is to identify the specific features of human resource management in successful European multinational enterprises during the economic crisis. In this study the differences in human resource management among European multinational enterprises depending on their performance during the economic crisis were analyzed. In addition, the relationship between human resource management characteristics and performance of multinational enterprises in the crisis period were studied. The results of the study revealed the specific features of human resource management in the most successful multinational enterprises during the economic crisis.

 

#2 (E)–2016

E. Aleksandrova, O. Verkhovskaya. Motivations to Start Businesses: Institutional Context. Working Paper #2(E) – 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords: Necessity-driven entrepreneurship, institutional environment, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey (GEM)

Abstract: This preprint is the second part of the Necessity-driven Entrepreneurship: a cross-country Analysis project.
This paper takes institutional environment’s perspective on entrepreneurship in general, on necessity-driven entrepreneurship in particular, therefore incorporating its multidimensional nature and enabling more detailed understanding of interaction between entrepreneurial motivation and institutional arrangements.
The main content of this research determines the significant factors in the regulatory, normative, and cognitive pillars of the institutional environment. Using the databases of World Bank, the International Labour Organization, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey, the Doing Business, and the World Economic Forum the set of the variables of the institutional environment was defined. These data are from 2009 to 2014, and range across 70 countries.
Our research shows that different institutional factors influence the total level of entrepreneurial activity and motivation structure differently.

 

#3 (E)–2016

I. V. Berezinets, L. A. Bulatova, Y. B. Ilina, M.V. Smirnov. How Stock Market Reacts to Dividend Surprises: Russian and Indian Experience. Working Paper #3(E) - 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Dividend surprise, stock market reaction, emerging markets, event study analysis, abnormal return

Abstract: This paper empirically investigates average reaction of emerging markets of Russia and India to dividend surprises on the post-crisis period 2010-2014. Traditionally, unexpected dividend component has been measured in relation to the “naïve” model, which assumes that the next period expected dividend level equals the previously paid dividend. The study proposes different, rarely applied in the dividend announcements literature analysts’ expectations-based approach to measure unexpected component of a dividend announcement. As a proxy for dividend surprise the difference between the actual dividend and the consensus analyst forecast is used. The research was conducted using event study methodology on the sample of Russian and Indian public companies, which regularly pay dividends. Obtained results of the study provide the grounds to make conclusions about the fact that Russian market on average reacts negatively to both good and bad dividend surprises; good dividend surprises on average trigger positive abnormal returns on Indian stocks, whereas bad and no surprises are associated with negative reaction of Indian market. In this research the results are discussed from the perspective of signaling theory of dividends, markets efficiency, behavioral finance, economic and legal issues. The results of the study could provide market players with an instrument of investments decision-making. For companies it is important to take into account market reaction when deciding upon dividend payments and improvement their dividend policies.

 

#4 (E)–2016

A. Bukhvalov, O. Alekseeva. International Joint Venture Acquisition by a Foreign or Local Partner. Working Paper, # 4 (E) - 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: international joint venture (IJV); IJV acquisition by one of the partners; determinants of IJV acquisition by one of the partners.

Abstract: managing on international joint venture post-formation is a critical decision for both foreign and local managers. Reviewing the literature in international and strategic management, the authors discuss recent findings of research on international joint venture acquisition by a foreign or local partner over the past 15 years. In doing so, the authors provide an in-depth review of theoretical foundation of IJV acquisition by one of the partners, the dominant determinants and a framework of research on IJV acquisition by a foreign or local partner. This proposed framework groups eight determinants and integrates the antecedents of IJV formation – described by complementary assets between partners and previous experience of a foreign and local partner, initial IJV characteristics influence – described by ownership structure, control and bargaining power, shifts of IJV characteristics – by three previous determinants and IJV performance, moderators – uncertainty, learning and new experience influences, and the decision of IJV acquisition by one of the partners. As a conclusion, the authors provide several recommendations for future research.

 

#5 (E)–2016

K. Golovacheva. When Consumers Activate Persuasion Knowledge: Review of Antecedents and Consequences. Working Paper #5(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: marketing stimuli; influence tactics; persuasion knowledge; consumer response.

Abstract: The article aims to complexly examine the role of persuasion knowledge activation in consumer response. To handle the purpose, the author reviews the related studies published since 1994 when the term “persuasion knowledge“ was introduced to scientific discourse. The literature review shows that persuasion knowledge activation is mainly associated with negative consequences for firms resulting in a more critical assessment of marketing stimuli by consumers, less favorable judgements and behavior in relation to firms and brands. Besides, there is empirical evidence that consumers can activate persuasion knowledge even in the absence of firms’ persuasion intent. Ultimately, the effect of persuasion knowledge activation on consumer response to marketing stimuli is dependent upon a variety of moderating factors and intrinsic characteristics of the phenomenon addressed in a particular study. The study contributes to persuasion knowledge literature by combining conceptual theorizations articulated in the seminal article by Friestad and Wright with empirical evidence appeared afterwards, so the theory is enriched and clarified.

 

#6 (E)–2016

M. Fomin. Business Cycles and Acquisition Policy: Analysis of M&A Deals of Metallurgical Companies. Working Paper #6(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: mergers and acquisitions, M&A, business cycle, metal prices, metallurgical industry, emerging markets

Abstract: Business and management literature pointed out on the existence of business cycles and on the importance of conducting countercyclical mergers and acquisition policy. However, according to the merger wave theory in practice acquisitions are likely to be procyclical because of real and behavioral factors. The majority of empirical papers finds positive link between M&A activity and state of the cycle, suggesting that acquisitions are procyclical. This paper tests whether M&A deals of metallurgical companies in China, Russia and India are procyclical. The results show that deals are indeed procyclical, but only at a glance. Introducing intermediate state of valuation in the metal market indicates that the majority of acquisitions were made when prices where close to the neutral state. As the result, acquisition policy can be characterized as neutral to the state of the cycle.

 

#7 (E)–2016

M. Latukha, A. Veselova, L. Selivanovskikh, E. Artukh, E. Mitskevich. Re-thinking the Role of Talent Management in a Firm’s Performance: Talent Management Practices and Absorptive Capacity. Working Paper #7(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: absorptive capacity, talent management, firm’s performance, Brazil, Russia, India, China

Abstract: This work aims to provide an overview of new per-spectives of talent management research linked to investigation of the relationship between talent management (TM) practices, absorptive capacity (AC), and a firm’s performance. We review the current theories in TM and provide the understanding of AC through TM lens. We discuss emerging market context as a setting for our study whereas Brazilian, Russian, Indian and Chinese firms will be analyzed to provide the link between TM and AC.

 

#8 (E)–2016

L. Ermolaeva. Negative or Positive: Which Experience Matters for International M&A Initiation Stage? Working Paper #7(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Russian MNEs, absorptive capacity, M&A initiation stage, prior experience, institutional environment.

Abstract: This study aims to uncover the initiation stage of international M&A and indicate what type of experience affect the successful completion of this stage. Besides different types of experience are analyzed in different formal and informal institutional settings in order to reveal how institutional environment can moderate firm’s absorptive capacity implementation on M&A initiation stage.
In the study sample of 509 international M&A deals initiated by Russian MNEs in the period of 2000-2012 is empirically tested by mean of logistic regression analysis. The empirical analysis indicates that prior experience in certain market always increases the probability of M&A deal announcement irrespectively the degree of proximity with formal and informal institutions of the host country. However firm’s negative experience impedes further internationalization especially if institutional environment is dissimilar. Positive M&A experience may as increase probability of M&A deal announcement as decrease it depending on familiar-ity with institutional environment.

 

#9 (E)–2016

G. Shirokova, T. Beliaeva, E. Gafforova. Strategic Orientations During Economic Crisis: Stay Focused or Adopt a Broader Strategic Direction? Working Paper #9 (E) -2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Strategic orientations, entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, learning orientation, economic crisis, small and medium-sized enterprises, Russia

Abstract: While there is a growing interest in management literature towards exploring multiple strategic orientations, their interactions and influence on firm performance, most research has been conducted in stable economic environments and developed countries. Taking into consideration the contemporary economic instability and its effect on business operations, it is timely to develop an understanding of strategic directions which may help firms create proper behaviors for managing their way through economic crises. In this study, we examine the role of entrepreneurial, market, and learning orientation in mitigating the negative effects of economic crisis and sanctions on firm’s operations. Based on the dataset of 612 Russian small and medium-sized enterprises collected during the crisis period in 2015-2016, the results indicate that firms with a broader strategic direction are more affected by the unfavorable economic conditions compared to firms which are focused on a particular strategic orientation.

 

#10 (E)–2016

A. Bordunos, S. Kosheleva. High Involvement Work System from Organizational and Individual Perspective. Working Paper #10(E)-2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: HIWS, HCM, SHRM, engagement, resilience, strategic advantage

Abstract: This paper contributes to the search of suitable and sustainable strategy for managing corporate Human Capital. Drawing on the Self-determination theory, current research differentiates HCM strategies by resulting causality orientations of employees. In particular, the research focuses on the High Involvement-based Work System (HIWS), which is usually favored to create supportive environment for employees' engagement into Innovative Work Behavior. It implies high level of Autonomous Orientations.
In result of quantitative analysis, it turned out that HIWS is still a black box for many organizations: despite high importance of autonomy and relatedness for employees, the question about competence became a challenge. Furthermore, for top management and HR managers even question about relatedness was challenging. Thus, the research revealed that this strategic approach is still new for CIS countries: it increases employees' motivation, however does not lead to the increased engagement into Innovative Work Behavior or creativity development.
The research accounts for a contextual specificity of emerging markets and individual characteristics, and corresponds to such fields as SHRM, HRD, M&A, change management.

 

#11 (E)–2016

L. Kokoulina, L. Ermolaeva. Championing Processes and the Emergence of Industrial Symbiosis: Case of Yandex Data Center in Finland. Working Paper #11(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Industrial symbiosis, Champion, Championing, Regional development.

Abstract: We combine championing and industrial symbiosis perspectives with an ultimate goal to uncover the underlying mechanisms of industrial symbiosis. To study this emergent topic, we conduct single in-depth case study of industrial symbiosis between Russian company, Yandex, and local district heating provider in Mäntsälä, Finland.
Growing concerns about the environment and rising demand for IT services add to this re-search practical importance. That is the fact because there is lack of research on how data center creators could decrease an environmental footprint through collaboration with other organizations such as municipalities, NGO, and other commercial firms.
We rely on existing (yet sparse) theoretical understanding of industrial symbiosis and championing processes and conduct semi-structured and in-depth interviews of championing of industrial symbiosis on both organizational and individual levels. Overall 15 interviews were conducted with representatives of 5 organizations.

 

#12 (E)–2016

G. Shirokova, A. Laskovaia, O. Osiyevskyy. Planning Still Matters: Exploring the Association between Venture Cognitive Logic and Performance in Different Institutional Contexts. Working Paper #12(E) - 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: effectuation, causation, institutions, GUESSS, ease of doing busi-ness, financial market development index

Abstract: Strategic management and entrepreneurship literature traditionally pay substantive attention to rational decision-making processes with clear formalized plans and analytical procedures. Despite all the advantageous of planning-based logic, some scholars prefer alter-native approaches to making decisions. In entrepreneurship field, the effectuation theory rose to prominence, emphasizing analogical rather than analytical reasoning. While prior effectua-tion research focused primarily on studying personal characteristics of entrepreneurs, this pa-per is intended to reach a new level in examining macro-level factors that may influence the efficiency of entrepreneurial cognitive processes. Particularly, we investigate how formal institutions shape the relationship between venture cognitive logic of 4413 student entrepreneurs and performance of their ventures. We demonstrate that this relationship is to a large extent shaped by the characteristics of the country-level institutional environment (particularly, level of financial market development and generalized index of the ease of doing business).

 

#13 (R)–2016

К.П. Яблонский, Ю.В. Федотов. Оценка эффективности деятельности организаций: случай медицинских учреждений здравоохранения Санкт-Петербурга. Научный доклад #13(R) - 2016. Высшая школа менеджмента, Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет: СПб, 2016.

Ключевые слова: измерение эффективности, медицинские организации, бенчмаркинг

Аннотация: Доклад посвящен проблемам измерения эффективности деятельности ме-дицинских организаций. Проанализированы порождаемые спецификой их деятельности требования, предъявляемые к измерению эффективности данного типа организаций. Рассмотрены общепризнанные в теории и практике менеджмента подходы к измерению организационной эффективности (SMART, метод ключевых показателей эффективности, сбалансированная система показателей, программа качества Болдриджа). Особое внимание уделено существующему порядку оценки эффективности деятельности стационарных медицинских организаций, утвержденному распоряжением Комитета по здравоохранению Санкт-Петербурга в 2013г. Он детально анализируется с точки зрения соответствия рассмотренным принципам и концепциям измерения эффективности. В целях мониторинга деятельности медицинских организаций, а также принятия Комитетом по здравоохранению Санкт-Петербурга управленческих решений, предлагается ис-пользовать подход к оценке эффективности деятельности, основанный на фронтальных методах анализа данных (Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis). Проанализированы полученные указанными методами оценки эффективности деятельности медицинских организаций Санкт-Петербурга в 2013–2015гг, показана непротиворечивость результатов оценивания.

 

#14 (E)–2016

L. Pakhomova. Competitive Priorities in Operations and Technology Management: Literature Review. Working Paper # 14(E) - 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: competitive priorities, operations strategy, literature review, innovation

Abstract: These days an ability of a company to achieve operational excellence in multiple priorities is considered by researchers and practitioners as a source of company’s competitive advantage. However, the current state of knowledge does not have a consensus on how competitive priorities emphasis can be achieved. This paper is devoted to the literature review analysis on the topic of competitive priorities and their role in operations strategy and business performance. The analysis was based on the articles published in top-tier journals in Operations and Technology Management field during 1969-2015. On the basis of this analysis, the current state of competitive priorities concept in Operations and Technology Management has been described and suggestions for future research have been developed.

 

#15 (E)–2016

E. Blagov, K. Zhukova, A. Pleshkova. Knowledge Sharing Barriers at Administrative Level of Undergraduate Programs. Working Paper #15(E) - 2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: knowledge management, knowledge sharing, educational management, University

Abstract: It is widely recognized that knowledge is the critical asset to individual as well as organization to succeed in the increasingly competitive environment. The study of knowledge sharing is dominated by those focusing on knowledge sharing activity within the business organizations. However, the issue of knowledge sharing is equally important for a knowledge-based institution, such as a university, where knowledge production, distribution and application are ingrained in the institution. Though there is no direct way to measure the outcome of knowledge sharing in knowledge institutions, the impact of knowledge sharing could be larger than those created by the business organizations.
In this paper we explore the knowledge sharing barriers in the administrative processes of the undergraduate educational programs on an evidence of the Bachelor in Management program at one Business school. The study employs qualitative method, based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with the administrative personnel involved in the program’s management. On the basis of the interview results, recommendations regarding improving the program’s knowledge sharing environment are given, as well as the methodology of further quantitative research is developed, planning to expand the research to a statistically significant sample of educational programs at University as well as other educational institutions.

 

#16 (E)–2016

T. Brown, A. Panibratov, Foreign divestment decisions: a theoretical framework. Working Paper #16(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Foreign Divestment, theory development, organization theory, decision-making, strategy

Abstract: Foreign Divestment (FD) over the last few decades have been generally viewed as a sign of failure or negative whether it is a voluntary business strategy or a last resort for an international company. The decision making process and execution of Foreign Divestment has been an in-creasing phenomenon which has been noted by researchers over the years as a very complicated decision, however a holistic theory has yet to be developed to address this issue. In this paper the author seeks to give insight based on Mintzberg and Walters 1985 “Of deliberate and emergent strategies” framework and organization theories which are used as the foundation of a model of FD decision and leadership. Subjective insight for the closest related organization theories are used to provide a framework from which divestment decisions and strategies are created.

 

#17 (E)–2016

B. Pantic. Comparability of financial reports: a literature review of most recent Studies. Working Paper #17(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Financial statements, comparability, IFRS, literature review

Abstract: Financial statement comparability has for a long time been one of the main points of interest of financial accounting research. Recent studies and particularly those that followed De Franco et al.’s (2011) influential paper were mostly focused on putting to use the results of the financial reporting process to measure the level of accounting comparability and thus the compa-rability of financial results between companies. This working paper makes a short survey of re-cent studies that measure comparability of financial statements. As such it describes and com-ments on four important studies that introduced measuring concept for this problem. Second part of the research deals with classification of recent different streams of literature in this field. In conclusion, It also sums up what has already been achieved in comparability research.

 

#18 (E)–2016

A. Ivakina, N. Zenkevich. Supply chain cooperative strategies: trends and gaps. Working Paper #18(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: supply chain cooperation, collaboration, supply chain management, financial supply chain management

Abstract: Supply chains (SC) are generally complex and are characterized by numerous activities spread over multiple functions and organizations, which bring up numerous challenges for efficient SC cooperation (SCC). To meet these challenges, SC members must work to-wards a unified system and cooperate with each other. The aim of the work is firstly to pro-vide a comprehensive literature review of the current trends in SCs cooperative strategies modeling and secondly to highlight the fruitful research avenues in this field. As a result, it was found, that in the previous years the research work on supply chain management has primarily focused on the study of materials and information flows and very little work has been done on the study of upstream and downstream flows of money. It is shown, that financial SCs are an integral component of SCs and yet there is very little research that specifically ad-dresses the strategy, implementation and performance of financial SCs. Thus, the further step ahead is development of models of collaborative supply chain networks in the field of financial supply chain management. In order to proceed to such a modeling financial supply chain management key elements are outlined and presented as a theoretical model from the perspective of long-term inter-organizational relationships.

 

#19 (E)–2016

K. Nefedov, A. Panibratov. Dimensions of global value chain analysis: new theoretical developments and methodological issues. Working Paper #19(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: Global Value Chains (GVCs), Global Commodity Chains (GCCs), Emerging multinationals (EMNEs), Institutional dimension of GVC analysis.

Abstract: In this paper we explore the dimensions of GVC approach to global economy by providing a detailed overview of the extant research in the field. This literature stream of Global Chain studies is particularly notable due to its multidisciplinary setting both in its origin and current state on the one hand and its methodological unity on the other. There was found a lack in studies applying GVC methodology to research institutional context and theoretical propositions were developed based on the existing literature.

 

#20 (E)–2016

G. Shirokova, L. Ivvonen. Performance of Russian SMEs during the economic crisis: The role of strategic entrepreneurship. Working paper #20(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: strategic entrepreneurship, exploration, exploitation, SME, firm performance, economic crisis, human capital, financial capital, Russia.

Abstract: This study examines how components of strategic entrepreneurship (exploration and exploitation) relate to Russian SMEs performance during the economic crisis and to what extent combinations of firm resources determine these relationships. In order to address these issues we surveyed 651 Russian private SMEs. Our results show that during the economic crisis exploitation is positively associated with SME’s performance. However, we found positive association of exploration with SME’s performance during the economic crisis instead of negative association. Our results also indicate that relationship between exploration as well as exploitation and firm performance is dependent on different combinations of firm resources.

 

#21 (E)–2016

K. Bogatyreva, G. Shirokova, O. Osiyevskyy. Intention-behavior translation in student entrepreneurship: an institutional perspective. Working Paper #21(E)–2016. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2016.

Keywords and phrases: entrepreneurial intentions; intention-behavior link; formal institutions; GUESSS; student entrepreneurship   

Abstract: Entrepreneurial behavior is usually initiated by formation of corresponding intention. At the same time, entrepreneurial intentions do not always materialize constituting in this way an intention-behavior gap in entrepreneurship. The environmental triggers of entrepreneurial intention-action translation remain to be understudied. With a piece of cross-country data derived from the GUESSS survey conducted in 2011 and 2013/2014, we study the entrepreneurial intention-action link among university students focusing on the essential context-specific moderators of this relationship. Namely, we reveal country financial market institutions and property rights protection system to impact the link between entrepreneurial intentions and further start-up activities.

 

 

2015 год

 

№ 1 (E)–2015

Zavyalova E. K., Kucherov D. G., Kosheleva S. V., Tsybova V. S., Alsufyev A. I.  Analysis of Effective Utilization of Human Capital (by example of the Russian oil and gas companies). Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

Human capital is one of the most important intangible assets of modern companies. In this paper, the human capital is considered in terms of microeconomic approach as a set of knowledge and skills of the worker, which influences the level of productivity and well-being of the company. The paper presents results of empirical research on evaluating the effectiveness of the use of human capital in the Russian oil and gas sector of the economy.

 

№ 2 (E)–2015

Panibratov A., Dikova D., Veselova A., Ermolaeva L. Determinants of Russian Cross-Border Acquisitions: the Joint Effect of Investment Motives and International Context. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In this paper we apply the OLI paradigm to examine the impact of macroeconomic influences on the trends of Russian cross-border M&As over the period 2007-2013. Our analysis gives an understanding of what attracts Russian investors abroad or in other words what motives – market-seeking, resource-seeking, efficiency-seeking or asset (technology)-seeking – are critical for them. The main thrust of our paper is that not only factors associated with the M&A target (host) country are important determinants of Russian firms’ investment-location decisions, but institutional differences between Russia and the host country play an important, moderating role. We test our model using current data, derived from open sources (e.g., international databases and national statistic agencies). Despite several limitations, our study reveals valuable insights about cross-border M&A determinants of Russian firms.

 

№ 3 (E)–2015

Berezinets I. V., Bulatova L. A., Ilina Y. B.   Dividend Announcements Impact on Stock Returns: Evidence from the Emerging Market of India. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

This article presents the results of an empirical study of the impact of dividends announcements on the Indian companies’ stock returns. Interest in the Indian stock market is due to the fact that today it is one of the largest and fastest growing markets. The research method used to measure the market reaction to announcements of dividend payments, is the event study analysis. The study was conducted on a sample of Indian companies whose shares are actively traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange in the period 2010 to 2012. The results obtained allow concluding that the Indian market, on average, reacts positively on the announcement of the increased dividend amount, reacts negatively to the announcement of the reduced amount of dividends and does not react on the announcement about the dividend amount unchanged.

 

№ 4 (E)–2015

Khomich S. G., Smirnova M. M., Rebiazina V. A.  The effect of Cooperation at Different Stages of Innovation Process on Company’s Performance. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

Existing research has highlighted the importance of cooperation in innovation. However, there still is insufficient understanding of how cooperation is linked to the stages of innovation process. Current working paper aims to answer the following research questions: (1) At what stages of innovation process do the companies cooperate more: when they create or commercialize innovation? (2) Does the cooperation in innovation depend on the relational learning capability? (3) On what stage does cooperation stronger influence the company's performance? We answer these questions by examining innovation cooperation on example of a sample of 157 Russian firms. The findings highlight the role of relational learning and indicate distinctive characteristics of cooperation at the early and the late innovation process stages.

 

№ 5 (E)–2015

Sokolova E. V. The Impact of Vertical Integration on Retail Gasoline Prices in Russia. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The paper explores factors influencing retail prices in Russian domestic gasoline market in Russia. The role of dominant vertically integrated oil companies is considered to be of great importance, so the author tries to define possible scenarios of development of retail markets of gasoline under existing market structure. Conditions for establishment of retail prices, which tend to be close to competitive ones are discussed.

 

№ 6 (E)–2015

Andreeva T., Garanina T. Intellectual Capital Elements and Organizational Performance of Russian Manufacturing Companies. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

Intellectual Capital (IC) has been argued to be the key element of value creation in the contemporary economy, and this argument has been widely supported by empirical research, but mainly based on the data from developed markets. The questions of how IC and its elements work in emerging markets remains under-researched, and limited empirical evidence that exists contrasts the conclusions drawn from developed countries. The aim of this study is to provide empirical insight into the relationship between three main elements of IC (human, relational and organizational) and organizational performance of Russian companies. The sample includes 240 Russian companies. The data is collected with the survey using the scales that have been already validated in international context. The paper contributes to further development of IC theory by investigating its application in anew institutional and cultural context.

 

№ 7 (E)–2015

Ivanov A.  On the New Approach to the Risks’ Identification in the Projects of Public-Private Partnership. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In the paper proven strategic planning techniques for analyzing the external environment of the organization are corrected and applied to identify risks in PPP projects. The corrections into techniques are connected with some specific features of PPP projects: an influence of external environment on the public partner, possibility to attract public partner to the risk neutralization, etc.

 

№ 8 (E)–2015

Beliaeva T., Laskovaia A., Shirokova G.. Entrepreneurial Learning and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Approach. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The present study explores the link between entrepreneurial learning and students’ entrepreneurial intentions, and examines the role of national cultural characteristics in this relationship. We contribute to the existing literature on entrepreneurial intentions by applying the concept of entrepreneurial learning and cross-cultural approach. The hypotheses of the study are tested empirically using a dataset of 84,812 students from 28 countries, collected as part of the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students Survey (GUESSS) research project in 2013-2014. To measure the cultural characteristics of countries, we rely on measures of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Results reveal a positive relationship between entrepreneurial learning from university programs and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. In addition, the relationship was found to be moderated by the elements of national culture, being stronger in individualistic cultures and weaker in uncertainty avoidance cultures.

 

№ 9 (E)–2015

Shirokova G., Puffer S. M., Bogatyreva K., Beliaeva T. Entrepreneurial Orientation in Different Environmental Settings: A Comparative Cross-Country Study. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

While a significant body of literature has explored the link between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm performance, most research has been based in single country settings without taking into account cross-country differences. In this study, we investigate the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance and the moderating role of environmental context in a developed and an emerging market. Our analysis of 104 Russian and 117 Finnish SMEs suggests that in a developed market context the EO dimensions of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking are positively and directly associated with firm performance, while in an emerging market the relationship is moderated by the dynamic and hostile external environment. The specifics of national culture and different stages of institutional development may explain the differences in the way entrepreneurial orientation dimensions relate to firm performance.

 

№ 10 (E)–2015

Bystrova Y., Shirokova G. Organizational Changes and Firm Performance: Evidence from Russian New Ventures. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

This paper represents results of the research devoted to investigation of the influence of various types of organizational changes on Russian new ventures’ performance. In order to explore this topic and define relationship existing studies, covering influence of organizational changes on the performance and key characteristics of new ventures are analyzed. Hypotheses on the impact of technological and administrative changes such as the introduction of new management systems, new methods of responsibilities distribution among employees, changes in the management structure and outsourcing of non-core operations for the first time, on new ventures’ performance are tested. The empirical study is based on 1129 Russian new ventures from the database Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS), collected in 2012.  The findings are interesting and have implications for managers and researchers. This study reveals negative influence of technological changes. Second, positive influence of administrative changes on new ventures’ performance was confirmed. Finally, it was concluded that manager’s experience influences positively on firm’s performance while conducting organizational changes, but to a certain value.

 

№ 11 (R)–2015

Бухвалов А. В., Алексеева О. А. Стратегии международных компаний: влияние факторов неопределенности. Научные доклады. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2015.

Влияние факторов неопределенности одна из самых активно изучаемых тем в современных исследованиях посвященных стратегиям МНК. Несмотря на то, что на сегодняшний момент в научной литературе накоплено огромное количество публикаций, посвященных этой проблеме, деловая практика требует разработки адекватных механизмов для принятия стратегических решений в рамках концепции неопределенности. Эта работа содержит в себе обзор литературы о  роли факторов неопределенности в стратегии МНК и представляет основные научные позиции по вопросу влияния факторов неопределенности на принятие стратегических решений в МНК. Результат этого доклад предусматривает несколько направлений будущих исследований.

 

№ 12 (R)–2015

Фомин М. В., Бухвалов А. В. Анализ сделок слияний и поглощений российских металлургических компаний. Научные доклады. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2015.

Стратегический менеджмент и теория делового цикла обращают внимание на значимость контрцикличных политик по управлению деловым циклом (contracyclical business cycle management practices), среди которых можно выделить политику по проведению сделок слияний и поглощений (M&A). Согласно контрцикличной политике M&A компаниям следует покупать предприятия на стадии падения, когда цены являются низкими и продавать активы (в случае необходимости) на стадии подъёма, когда цены завышены для достижения цели прибыльности деятельности. В работе рассмотрены сделки M&A российских металлургических компаний во время последнего делового цикла (2000 – 2013 годы). Металлургическая отрасль традиционно рассматривается как пример отрасли, находящейся под значительным воздействием со стороны колебаний делового цикла по причине эластичности предложения металлов и промышленного производства. Показано, что фактическая политика M&A финансировалась за счёт долга и была процикличной, а не контрцикличной, что противоречит теории. Показано, что большинство сделок было заключено во время стадии подъёма и даже на пике делового цикла, кроме того, некоторые активы были проданы на стадии кризиса. Также показано, что, несмотря на то, что рассмотренные компании придерживались сходных проциклических политик, некоторые из них оказались в состоянии финансовой несостоятельности. Появление риска финансовой несостоятельности объясняется не только степенью следования процикличной политики M&A, финансируемой за счёт долга, но и другими факторами – направлением географического развития и некоторыми факторами корпоративного управления.  

 

№ 13 (E)–2015

Bordunos A., Kokoulina L., Ermolaeva L.  Role of Enterprise Gamified System in Fostering Innovation Capacity: a Field Experiment. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In this paper, we explore the role of enterprise gamified system in innovation capacity. Taking a design thinking perspective, and drawing on literature on Innovative Work Behavior (IWB), we hypothesize that Perceived Organization Support (POS) is positively associated with innovation capacity. This relationship is mediated by the employee`s engagement and IWB. We further argue that the implementation of sustainable enterprise gamified system will improve POS and thus will enhance innovation capacity. Following instrumental approach in our research, we offer practical solution of aligning the enterprise gamified system to the needs and peculiarities of an organization. Main opportunities and limitations are discussed.

 

№ 14 (E)–2015

Golovacheva K. Consumer Response to Unit Price Increase: the Role of Pricing Tactics and Consumer Knowledge. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The study investigates how consumers react to unit price increases framed in an overt vs covert way (total price increase vs product downsizing). Using experimental data, covert (vs overt) unit price increase is proved to lead to a more positive consumer response in the short term when consumers have no access to external information and can rely only on their internal knowledge on covert pricing tactics usage. In the long term, when consumers have access to external information on covert pricing tactics usage, the effect of covert (vs overt) pricing tactics tends to become less favorable for companies: there is a deterioration of product attitude and producer trust judgements, acceleration of price unfairness perception, and lower purchase intention. The long-term effect is moderated by the source of consumer knowledge on pricing covert tactics usage: consumers who managed to internally invoke the knowledge on pricing tactics usage react differently to covert unit price increase in the long term than those whose knowledge on pricing tactics usage was externally invoked.

 

№ 15 (E)–2015

Iablonskii K., Fedotov Y. Organizational Performance Measurement of Healthcare Organizations. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In this paper the methods and techniques of performance measurement and their application for healthcare organizations are analyzed. The overview of the research in the field of performance measurement and, specifically, performance measurement in healthcare organizations, is done in order to reveal agenda for further research with regard to the case of Russian Federation. We argue that the operationalization the notion of “performance” in the models used for estimating of healthcare organizations’ efficiency is not sufficient for its assessment that has to integrate professional, public policy and customer perspectives. It is shown that techniques applied in modern studies of healthcare organizations’ performance allow for measuring of multi-input – multi-output productivity, and, thus, they do not embrace all three perspectives of the healthcare organizations’ performance.

 

№ 16 (E)–2015

Rucheva A. Determinants of Joint Supplier-retailer Project Performance in Category Management Field. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In the situation of increasing competition between retailers and between suppliers successful joint projects in category management field can be viewed as source of competitive advantage obtaining both for supplier and retailer. On the other hand unsuccessful category management projects can harm seriously supplier-retailer relationship. This study aims to investigate the factors which could influence the joint category management project performance in negative or positive way. The factors are classified by the stakeholders of category management process in product category. The finding presents the framework for future research concerning eliminating these factors in supplier-retailer relationship management.

 

№ 17 (R)–2015

Лукьянова А.Е., Смирнова Е. Выявление индикаторов кризиса: эффект финансового заражения на российском рынке. Научные доклады. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2015.

Научный доклад № 17 (R) - 2015. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2015., 30 стр.

В докладе представлены индикаторы финансового заражения, действующие на российском рынке, выявление которых позволит компании определить, насколько текущая ситуация близка к кризисной, а также понять, в какой именно области она может ждать проблем. Предложен алгоритм, который может использоваться при построении стратегии компании в области риск-менеджмента. Исследование проведено с использованием данных об индексах облигаций российских нефтегазовых компаний.

 

№ 18 (R)–2015

Вилло С. Корпоративная восприимчивость к обеспокоенности заинтересованных сторон: необратимость решений и принятие альтернатив. Научные доклады. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2015.

В докладе обсуждаются факторы, порождающие необратимость корпоративного решения, а также факторы восприимчивости компании к предлагаемым заинтересованными сторонами альтернативам. Необратимость корпоративного решения рассматривается на примере освоения нефтяного месторождения «Приразломное» группой компаний «Газпром», а предлагаемые заинтересованными сторонами альтернативы – на примере практик энергосбережения, на которых акцентировали внимание природоохранные организации. По результатам анализа, автор выделяет три группы внутриорганизационных факторов, порождающих необратимость решения компании и оказывающих влияние на восприимчивость компании к альтернативам, предлагаемым заинтересованными сторонами.

 

№ 19 (E)–2015

Knatko D., Shirokova G., Bogatyreva K. Industry Choice by Young Entrepreneurs in Different Country Settings: the Role of Human and Financial Capital. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

Entrepreneurial entry happens as a consequence of a general choice of an individual to become an entrepreneur. While most entrepreneurial entry studies rarely consider an entry into a particular industry to be an aspect of entrepreneurial decision making process, we address this issue taking into account individual, industrial, and country specific attributes. Using data from the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey (2013-2014) on young and active entrepreneurs and extending it with objective indicators derived from World Bank, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, and  International Property Rights Index datasets, we investigate how various factors influence entrepreneurial industry choice on an aggregated level of industrial typology: knowledge-intensive and capital-intensive industries. Drawing on the RBV and contingency approach, we link an industry choice with the level of human capital development and an access to financial capital and test for possible country-specific moderation effects. Our findings indicate that both types of capital have a significant impact on industry choice by young nascent entrepreneur. Our results also suggest that specific country environment serves as a moderator in this relationship. Thus, our study contributes to entrepreneurial entry research stream extending the understanding of entrepreneurial entry decision making nuances related to individual access to resources and both industry- and country-level contingencies.

 

№ 20 (E)–2015

Berezinets I. V., Bulatova L. A., Ilina Y. B., Smirnov M.V.  Stock Market Reaction to Dividend Surprises: Evidence from Russia. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The aim of this study is to empirically investigate an average reaction of emerging market of Russia to dividend surprises on the post-crisis period 2010-2014. Traditionally, unexpected dividend component has been measured in relation to the “naïve” model, which assumes that market players expect dividend levels to remain the same from one time period to another. The study proposes different, rarely applied in the dividend announcements literature analysts’ expectations-based approach to measure unexpected component of a dividend announcement. As a proxy for dividend surprise the difference between the actual dividend and the consensus analyst forecast is used. The research was conducted using event study methodology on the sample of Russian public companies, which regularly pay dividends. Obtained results of the study provide the grounds to make conclusions about the fact that Russian market on average reacts negatively to both good and bad dividend surprises. In this research the results are discussed from the point of view of markets efficiency, behavioral finance, economic and legal issues. The results of the study are of practical importance from the point of view of making investment decisions by the market players as well as from the side of the companies, which along with other factors should take into account market reaction when deciding upon dividend payments and enhancing their dividend policies.

 

№21 (E)–2015

Latukha M., Veselova A.,  Selivanovskikh  L. Talent Management Practices in Emerging Market Firms: Research Agenda. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

This paper reviews researches in talent management (TM) field and its implications for emerging markets’ context. We argue that there is necessity to investigate the extent to which multinational corporations from BRIC countries adopt TM practices and identifies factors influencing TM in Russia, China, India and Brazil. The paper aims to analyze theoretical background for TM to reveal the main directions of a comparative analysis of differences and peculiarities in talent practices in BRIC multinationals, the paper explores and provides a number of ideas and conclusions about TM challenges and talent practices in different emerging market contexts as a direction for further research.

 

№22 (E)–2015

Zavyalova E.K., Kosheleva S.V., Alsufyev A.I.,  Tsybova V.S.,  Kucherov D.G. Innovative Human Resource Management Practices in Indian IT Companies. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The current paper makes an attempt to investigate the emerging market context of India. Specifically, the focus is made on innovative human resource management (IHRM) practices employed by Indian IT companies. The drivers of adoption of innovative HRM practices by these companies include national environment, organizational restructuring and ownership structure, legitimizing drivers, organizational culture, and the role of HR department. The current paper contributes to the contingency perspective and contextual paradigm that state that particular sets of practices (e.g., IHRM) and organizational routines are likely to yield better performance if they are matched with specific objectives, conditions, and strategic interests that rise from the context of the external environment. Thus the paper is within an increasing trend to undertake studies in emerging markets context. In order to illustrate the wide range of the innovative HRM practices used by Indian IT companies, the paper analyzed three cases of Indian IT companies. Analysis of these cases shows variation of different types of such practices being adopted by Indian companies. Conclusions can serve as the foundation for recommendations to managers for increasing the performance of companies through using IHRM practices.

 

№23 (E)–2015

Loukianova A., Smirnova E. Strategic Risk-management with the Use of Market Risk Indicator: a comparative longitudinal study in the emerging markets. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In the working paper the market risk is assessed on the base of historical data from Russian and Chinese economies during 1995-2015. The conclusion made is that the financial contagion indicator can be used for the market risk assessment for practical and theoretical purposes.

 

№24 (E)–2015

Muravskii D., Smirnova M. Exploring Borrowed Brand Equity. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

In the study, borrowed brand equity is introduced as a construct, which is supposed to have a strong effect on brand equity leveraging and hence could be an important source of competi-tive advantage for companies.  It is suggested that the brand image and awareness of brands associated with the focal brand impact the effectiveness of marketing programs. The introduc-tion of the borrowed brand equity construct to the customer-based brand equity model also makes it possible to explore the impact of brand symbolism and customer value propositions and with that contribute to closing the theoretical gap between customer value and brand equity.

 

№25 (E)–2015

Panibratov A., Ermolaeva L. Outward Investments from China and Russia: Macroeconomic and Institutional Perspective. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

China is one of the strategic trade partners for Russia, and both countries are top investors among emerging economies. Surprisingly, this is not justified with the investigation of whether outward foreign direct investments (OFDI) from China and Russia differ from other economies and what are distinguishing characteristics of the OFDI originating from these two countries? Based on institutional theory we test the set of hypotheses concerning OFDI from China and Russia. We conduct panel regression analysis on the sample of Chinese and Russian OFDI for the period 2002-2012. The results show that informal institutions are more important for China than for Russia, whereas for Russian OFDI government plays guiding role. Moreover, our results contradict previous studies saying that less developed institutional environment is more attractive for firms from emerging markets; the rule of law variable shows positive significant coefficient for both countries. Nevertheless, traditional allocation of OFDI still remains important for China and Russia.

 

№26 (E)–2015

Ivanov  А. How to improve effectiveness of Anti-corruption Expertise: Public Procurement Case. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.

The paper proves a necessity of changing the approach to anti-corruption expertise. The analysis of opportunities for mala fide behavior of agents and evaluation of incentives for their bona fide behavior must be supple-mented by the assessment of proposed regulation quality.
In the paper two different algorithms of the extended anti-corruption expertise have been introduced: first algorithm is applied to the new regulation tool, second one – to the regulation tool which has been used in the past and some information on agents’ reaction is available. In the both cases the expertise starts from the modelling of society’s preferences and comparing them with the principal’s preferences which are modelled on the base of proposed regulation. The relationship between proposed algorithms of anti-corruption expertise and the typology of principal-agent models, based on the assumptions of bona /mala fides of the Principal and the Agent, is underlined.
The algorithm of extended anti-corruption expertise of first type is applied to the two legal instruments regulating the determining of a winner in the tender. The reference to the implementation of second type algorithm for the anti-corruption expertise of applying the price English auction in public procurement is supplied.

 

№27 (E)–2015

Aleksandrova E., Verkhovskaya O. Institutional Determinants of Necessity-driven Entrepreneurship.

Necessity-driven entrepreneurship, institutional environment, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey (GEM)
Abstract: This preprint is the first part of the Necessity-driven Entrepreneurship: a cross-country Analysis project.
In this paper we identify determinants of necessity-driven entrepreneurship in developed and developing countries. We describe the differences in the socio-demographic characteristics of necessity- and opportunity-driven entrepreneurs, as well as their perceptions and aspirations.
The main content of this research determines the significant factors in the regulatory, normative, and cognitive pillars of the institutional environment.
Using the databases of World Bank, the International Labour Organization, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey, the Doing Business, and the World Economic Forum, we defined the set of the variables of the institutional environment. These data are from 2009 to 2014, and range across 70 countries.

 

  

2014 год

 

№ 1 (E)–2014

Shirokova G. V., Bogatyreva K. A., Morris M. H. Expertise, University Infrastructure and Cognitive Logic: Assessing Students Who Start Ventures. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Peters-burg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 2 (E)–2014

Manolova T., Shirokova G., Tsukanova T., Edelman L. The Impact of Family Support on Young Nascent Entrepreneurs’s Start-Up Activities: A Family Embeddedness Perspective. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 3 (E)–2014

Ivanov A., Maslova S. Applying Modelling in the Process of Anti-corruption Expertise of Legal Regulation of Public Procurement. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 4 (E)–2014

Andreeva T., Bezginova Y., Garanina T., Sergeeva A. Customer Value Creation Process in Russian Companies: the role of Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management Practices. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 5 (E)–2014

Berezinets I., Ilina Y., Alekseeva L. Ownership Structure and Dividend Policy: A Study of Russian Public Companies with Dual Class Shares. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 6 (E) –2014

Panibratov A., Latukha M. The Vector of the Home Government Influence upon Russian MNEs: Balancing the control against the interest. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 7 (E)–2014

Smirnova M., Rebiazina V. Strategic Orientations as a Driver of Innovations in Russian Firms. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 8 (E)–2014

Sokolova E. Development of Oil Industry in Russia. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 9 (E) – 2014

Kosheleva S., Zavyalova E., Tsybova V., Kucherov D., Alsufyev A. Managing innovation in Russian competitive companies: the role of HRM. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2014.

 

№ 10 (R) - 2014

Завьялова Е.К., Кучеров Д.Г., Кошелева С.В., Цыбова В.С., Алсуфьев А.И. Анализ эффективности использования человеческого капитала (на примере российских компаний нефтегазового сектора). Научные доклады. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2014.

 

  

2013 год

 

№ 1 (E)–2013

G. V. Shirokova, L. S. Sokolova. Exploring the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Russian SMEs: The Role of Institutional Environment. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

№ 2 (R)–2013

А.Ф. Денисов. Не упустить детали, или что может осложнить жизнь специалисту по УЧР. Научные доклады. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2013.

 

№ 3 (E)–2013

A. Muravyev, I. Berezinets, Y. Ilina. The Structure of Corporate Boards and Private Benefits of Control: Evidence from the Russian Stock Exchange.

Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg

State University: SPb, 2013.

 

№ 4 (R)–2013

Т.М. Скляр, Е.В. Соколова. Организационно-управленческие инновации в здравоохранении. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2013.

 

№ 5 (E)–2013

A. Sergeeva, T. Andreeva. Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: Do Knowledge Management Practices Matter? Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2013.

 

№ 6 (R)–2013

Е.В. Соколова, А.С. Коноваленков. Может ли общественный транспорт спасти город: к вопросу о развитии транспортной инфраструктуры города (на примере Санкт-Петербурга).

СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2013.

 

№ 7 (E)–2013

I. Baranov, P. C. Castro, D. Micic, G. B. Salgado. Fiscal Impulse during the 2008 Crisis. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2013.

 

№ 8 (R)–2013

А.Е. Иванов. Об одном алгоритме моделирования коррупционного/квази-коррупционного поведения.

СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2013.

 

№ 9 (E)–2013

A. Alsufyev, E. Zavyalova. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENTPRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS:PROBLEM OVERVIEW. Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2013.

 

№ 10 (R) - 2013

В.С. Цыбова. Практика кправления человечискими ресурсами в инновационно-активных компаниях

СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2013.

 

 

2012 год

 

№ 1 (R)-2012

А.Л. Замулин. Лидерство в эпоху знаний. Научный доклад № 1 (R)-2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

№ 2 (E)-2012

I.N. Baranov. Quality of Secondary Education in Russia: Between Soviet Legacy and Challenges of Global Competitiveness. Working Paper # 2 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

№ 3 (R)-2012

Л.С. Серова. Микро-предприятия в экономике России: состояние и тенденции развития. Научный доклад № 3 (R)-2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

# 4 (E)–2012

G.V. Shirokova, D.M. Knatko, G. Vega. Separation of Management and Control in SMEs from Emerging Markets: The Role of Institutions. Working Paper # 4 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

№ 5 (R)–2012

Г.В. Широкова, М.А. Сторчевой. Влияние социальных сетей на выход на зарубежные рынки: из опыта трех российских предпринимательских фирм. Научные доклады, № 5 (R)–2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

№ 6 (R)–2012

А.К. Казанцев. Инновационное развитие университетов: аналитический обзор ведущих российских вузов. Научные доклады, № 6 (R)–2012. СПб: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

№ 7 (R)–2012

Д.В. Муравский, М.М. Смирнова, О.Н. Алканова. Капитал бренда в современной теории маркетинга. Научные доклады, № 7 (R)–2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

# 8 (E)–2012

E.B. Samuylova, D.V. Muravskii, M.M. Smirnova, O.N. Alkanova. The Role of Brand Characteristics in Brand Alliance Engagement with Different Types of Partners: An Exploratory Study. Working Paper # 8 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

№ 9 (R)–2012

Е.Ю. Благов. Факторы ценообразования многосторонних платформ: современное состояние и перспективы исследований. Научные доклады, № 9 (R)–2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

# 10 (E)–2012

E.K. Zavyalova, S.V. Kosheleva. Assessing the Efficiency of HRD Technologies in Knowledge-Intensive Firms. Working Paper # 10 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

# 11 (E)–2012

E.K. Zavyalova, S.V. Kosheleva. Human Potential as a Factor of Developing National Competitiveness of Brazil, Russia, India and China. Working Paper # 11 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2012.

 

# 12 (E)–2012
D.М. Muravskii, S.A. Yablonsky. Determining Disruptive Innovation Potential of Multi-Sided Platforms: Case of Digital Books. # 12 (E)–2012. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2012.

№ 13 (R)–2012
В.Ю. Аршавский, В.Л. Окулов. Контролируемый эксперимент по принятию решений в условиях неопределенности и риска. Научный доклад № 13 (R)–2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.

 

№ 14 (R)–2012

А.А. Муравьев. К вопросу о классификации российских журналов по экономике и смежным дисциплинам. Научные доклады, № 14 (R)–2012. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2012.


  

2011 год

 

№ 1 (R)-2011

А.А. Муравьев. О российской экономической науке сквозь призму публикаций российских ученых в отечественных и зарубежных журналах. Научный доклад № 1 (R)-2011. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2011.

 

№ 2 (R)-2011

С.И. Кирюков. Становление и развитие теории управления маркетинговыми каналами. Научный доклад № 2 (R)-2011. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2011.

 

№ 3 (R)-2011

Д.И. Баркан. Общая теория продаж в контексте дихотомии «развитие – рост». Научный доклад № 3 (R)-2011. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2011.

 

№ 4 (E)-2011

K.V. Krotov, R.N. Germain. A Contingency Perspective on Centralization of Supply Chain Decision-making and its Role in the Transformation of Process R&D into Financial Performance. Working Paper #4 (E)–2011. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University: SPb, 2011.

 

№ 5 (R)-2011

А.В. Зятчин. Сильные равновесия в теоретико-игровых моделях и их приложения. Научный доклад № 5 (R)–2011. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2011.

 

№ 6 (R)-2011

В.А. Ребязина. Формирование портфеля взаимоотношений компании с партнерами на промышленных рынках. Научный доклад № 6 (R)–2011. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2011.

 

  

2010 год

 

№ 1 (R)-2010 

И.Н. Баранов. Конкуренция в сфере здравоохранения. Научный доклад № 1 (R)-2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 2 (R)-2010

Т.А.Пустовалова. Построение модели оценки кредитного риска кредитного портфеля коммерческого банка (на основе методологии VAR). Научный доклад № 2 (R)-2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 3 (R)-2010

Ю.В.Лаптев. Влияние кризиса на стратегии развития российских МНК. Научный доклад № 3 (R)-2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 4 (R)-2010

А.В. Куликов, Г.В. Широкова. Внутрифирменные ориентации и их влияние на рост: опыт российских малых и средних предприятий. Научный доклад № 4 (R)-2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

# 5 (E)–2010

M. Storchevoy. A General Theory of the Firm: from Knight to Relationship Marketing. Working Paper # 5 (E)–2010. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2010.

 

№ 6 (R)–2010

А.А. Семенов. Появление систем научного менеджмента в России. Научные доклады, № 6 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

# 7 (E)–2010

Ivanov D. An optimal-control based integrated model of supply chain scheduling. Working Paper # 7 (E)–2010. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2010.

 

№ 8 (R)–2010

Н. П. Дроздова, И. Г. Кормилицына. Экономическая политика государства и формирование инвестиционного климата: опыт России конца XIX — начала ХХ вв. Научный доклад № 8 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ. 2010.

 

№ 9 (R)–2010

Д.В.Овсянко. Направления применения компонентов менеджмента качества в стратегическом управлении компаниями. Научный доклад № 9 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

# 10 (E)–2010

Vitally Cherenkov. Toward the General Theory of Marketing: The State of the Art and One More Approach. Working Paper # 10 (E)–2010. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2010.

 

№ 11 (R)–2010

В.Н.Тишков. Экономические реформы и деловая среда: опыт Китая. Научный доклад № 11 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 12 (R)–2010

Т.Н. Клёмина. Исследовательские школы в организационной теории: факторы формирования и развития. Научные доклады, № 12 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 13 (R)–2010

И.Я.Чуракова. Направления использования методик выявления аномальных наблюдений при решении задач операционного менеджмента. Научные доклады, № 13 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 14 (R)–2010

К.В. Кротов. Направления развития концепции управления цепями поставок. Научные доклады, № 14 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 15 (R)–2010

А.Г. Медведев. Стратегические роли дочерних предприятий многонациональных корпораций в России. Научные доклады, № 15 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 16 (R)–2010

А.Н. Андреева. Влияние печатной рекламы на восприятие бренда Shalimar (1925 – 2010). Научные доклады, № 16 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.

 

№ 17 (R)–2010

В.Л. Окулов. Ценность хеджирования для корпорации и рыночные ожидания. Научные доклады, № 17 (R)–2010. СПб.: ВШМ СПбГУ, 2010.


  

2009 год

 

№ 1(R)-2009

Н.А. Зенкевич. Моделирование устойчивого совместного предприятия. Научный доклад № 1(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

# 2(R)–2009

Г.В. Широкова, И.Б. Березинец, А.И. Шаталов. Влияние организационных изменений на рост фирмы. Научный доклад № 2(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

# 3(R)–2009

Г.В. Широкова, М.Ю. Молодцова, М.А. Арепьева. Влияние социальных сетей на разных этапах развития предпринимательской фирмы: результаты анализа данных Глобального мониторинга предпринимательства в России. Научный доклад № 3(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

# 4 (E)-2009

N. Drozdova. Russian Artel Revisited through the Lens of the New Institutional Economics. Discussion Paper #4(E)–2009.  Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2009.

 

№ 5 (R)-2009

Л.Е. Шепелёв. Проблемы организации нефтяного производства в дореволюционной России. Научный доклад № 5(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

№ 6 (R)-2009

Е.В. Соколова. Влияние государственной политики на инновационность рынков: постановка проблемы. Научный доклад № 6(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

№ 7 (R)-2009

А.А. Голубева, Е.В. Соколова.  Инновации в общественном секторе: введение в проблему. Научный доклад № 7(R)–2009 СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента СПбГУ, 2009.

 

# 8 (E)-2009

A. Damodaran. Climate Financing Approaches and Systems: An Emerging Country Perspective. Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2009.

 

  

2008 год

 
# 1 (E)–2008
Simon Commander, Jan Svejnar, Katrin Tinn. Explaining the Performance of Firms and Countries: What Does the Business Environment Play' Discussion Paper #1(E)–2008. Institute of Management, Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2008.
# 1a (R)–2008
Г.В.Широкова, В.А.Сарычева, Е.Ю.Благов, А.В.Куликов. Внутрифирменное предпринимательство: подходы к изучению вопроса. Научный доклад № 1(R)–2008 СПб.: Центр предпринимательства Высшей школы менеджмента СПбГУ, 2008.
# 1b (R)–2008
Г.В. Широкова, А.И. Шаталов, Д.М. Кнатько. Факторы, влияющие на принятие решения основателем компании о передаче полномочий профессиональному менеджеру: опыт стран СНГ и Центральной и Восточной Европы. Научный доклад № 1(R)–2008 СПб.:Институт стратегии, лидерства и инноваций ВШМ СПбГУ, 2008.


# 2 (R)–2008
Г.В. Широкова, А.И. Шаталов. Факторы роста российских предпринимательских фирм: результаты эмпирического анализа. Научный доклад № 2(R)–2008 СПб.:Институт стратегии, лидерства и инноваций ВШМ СПбГУ, 2008.


  

2007 год

 
#16(E)–2007
Natalia Drozdova. Russian “Artel’nost” — Myth or Reality' Artel’ as an Organizational Form in the XIX — Early XX Century Russian Economy: Comparative and Historical Institutional Analysis. Discussion Paper #16(E)–2007. Institute of Management, Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2007.
 
#15(Е)–2007
Galina Shirokova, Alexander Shatalov. Characteristics of companies at the early stages of the lifecycle: analysis of factors influencing new venture performance in Russia. Discussion Paper #15(E)–2007. Institute of Management, Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2007.
 
#14(R)–2007
Г.В.Широкова, Д.М.Кнатько. Влияние основателя на развитие организации: сравнительный анализ компаний управляемых основателями и наемными менеджерами. Научные доклады № 14(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#13(R)-2007
O.M. Удовиченко. Понятие, классификация, измерение и оценка нематериальных активов (объектов) компании: подходы к проблеме.  Научные доклады № 13(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#12(R)–2007
А.Е. Иванов. Размещение государственного заказа как задача разработки и принятия управленческого решения. Научные доклады № 12(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#11(R)–2007
Г. В. Широкова, А. И. Шаталов. Характеристики компаний на ранних стадиях жизненного цикла: анализ факторов, влияющих на показатели результативности их деятельности. Научные доклады  №11(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#10(R)–2007
К.В. Кротов. Управление цепями поставок: изучение концепции в контексте теории стратегического управления и маркетинга. Научные доклады № 10(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#9(E)–2007
Dmitry Volkov, Tatiana Garanina. Intellectual capital valuation: case of Russian companies. Discussion Paper #9(E)–2007. Institute of Management, Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2007.
 
#8(R)–2007
М.Н.Барышников. Баланс интересов в структуре собственности и управления российской фирмы в XIX – начале ХХ века. Научные доклады № 8(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#7(E)–2007
Dmitry Volkov, Irina Berezinets. Accounting-based valuations and market prices of equity: case of Russian market. Discussion Paper #7(E)–2007. Institute of Management, Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2007.
 
#6(R)–2007
С. П. Кущ, М. М. Смирнова. Механизм координации процессов управления взаимоотношениями компании с партнерами. Научные доклады № 6(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#5(R)–2007
А. А. Голубева. Оценка порталов органов государственного управления на основе концепции общественной ценности. Научные доклады № 5(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#4(R)–2007
Т. Е. Андреева. Индивидуальные предпочтения работников к созданию и обмену знаниями: первые результаты исследования. Научные доклады № 4(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#3(R)–2007
Т.М. Скляр. Проблема ленивой монополии в российском здравоохранении. Научные доклады № 3(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#2(R)–2007
С.П.Кущ, М.М.Смирнова. Управление поставками в российских компаниях: стратегия или тактика' Научные доклады № 2(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 
#1(R)–2007
Е.В.Соколова. Бенчмаркинг в инфраструктурных отраслях: анализ методологии и практики применения (на примере электроэнергетики). Научные доклады № 1(R)–2007. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2007.
 

  

2006 год

 
№ 44(R)–2006
Н.П. Дроздова. Российская «артельность» — мифологема или реальность' (Артельные формы хозяйства в России в XIX — начале ХХ в.: историко-институциональный анализ). Научные доклады № 44(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#43(E)–2006
Irina Merkuryeva, Elena Paramonova, Julia Bitina, Veronika Gilchenok. Economic Analysis Based on Matched Employer-Employee Data: Methodology of Data Collection and Research. Discussion Paper №43(E)–2006. Institute of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 42(R)–2006
И.С. Меркурьева, Е.Н. Парамонова, Ю.М. Битина, В.Л. Гильченок. Экономический анализ на основе связанных данных по занятым и работодателям: методология сбора и использования данных. Научные доклады №  42(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 41(R)–2006
Благов Ю.Е. Институционализация менеджмента заинтересованных сторон в российских компаниях: проблемы и перспективы использования модели «Арктурус». Научные доклады № 41(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 40(R)–2006
В.А. Чайка, А.В. Куликов. Динамические способности компании: введение в проблему. Научные доклады №  40(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 39(R)–2006
В.Г. Беляков, О.Р. Верховская, В.К. Дерманов, М.Н. Румянцева. Глобальный мониторинг предпринимательской активности Россия: итоги 2006 года. Научные доклады № 39(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 38(R)–2006
Н.А. Зенкевич, Л.А. Петросян. Дифференциальные игры в менеджменте. Научные доклады № 38(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 37(R)–2006
Е.Л. Шекова. Развитие корпоративной социальной ответственности в России: позиция бизнеса (на примере благотворительной деятельности компаний Северо-Западного региона). Научные доклады № 37(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 36(R)–2006
А.В. Бухвалов, В.Л. Окулов. Классические модели ценообразования на капитальные активы и российский финансовый рынок. Часть 1. Эмпирическая проверка модели CAPM. Часть 2. Возможность применения вариантов модели CAPM. Научные доклады № 36 (R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#35(Е)–2006
Andreeva Tatiana, Yurtaikin Evgeniy, Soltitskaya Tatiana. Human resources development practices as a key tool to attract, motivate and retain knowledge workers. Discussion Paper #35(E)–2006. Institute of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 34(R)–2006
Т.Е. Андреева, Е.Е. Юртайкин, Т.А. Солтицкая. Практики развития персонала как инструмент привлечения, мотивации и удержания интеллектуальных работников. Научные доклады № 34(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 33(R)–2006
А.К. Казанцев,  Л.С. Серова, Е.Г. Серова, Е.А. Руденко. Индикаторы мониторинга информационно-технологических ресурсов регионов России. Научные доклады № 33(R)–2006. НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 32(R)–2006
М.О. Латуха, В.А. Чайка, А.И. Шаталов. Влияние «жестких» и «мягких» факторов на успешность внедрения системы менеджмента качества: опыт российских компаний. Научные доклады № 32 (R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 31(R)–2006
С.П. Кущ, М.М. Смирнова. Управление взаимоотношениями в российских компаниях: разработка концептуальной модели исследования. Научные доклады №  31(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#30(E)–2006
Maria Smirnova. Managing Buyer-Seller Relationships in Industrial Markets:  A Value Creation Perspective. Discussion Paper #30(E)–2006. Saint Petersburg State University: St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 29(R)–2006
Е.В. Соколова, Ю.В. Федотов, Н.В. Хованов. Построение сводной оценки эффективности комплексов мероприятий по повышению надежности функционирования объектов электроэнергетики. Научные доклады № 29(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 28(R)–2006
Н.В. Хованов, Ю.В. Федотов. Модели учета неопределенности при построении сводных показателей эффективности деятельности сложных производственных систем. Научные доклады № 28(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 27(R)–2006
А.Н. Андреева. Портфельный подход к управлению люксовыми брендами в фэшн-бизнесе: базовые концепции, ретроспектива и возможные сценарии. Научные доклады № 27 (R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#26(E)–2006
Sergei Kouchtch, Maria Smirnova, Konstantin Krotov, Andrey Starkov. Managing Relationships in Russian Companies: Results of an Empirical Study. Discussion Paper #26(E)–2006. Saint Petersburg State University: St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 25(R)–2006
Ю.В. Федотов, Н.В. Хованов. Методы построения сводных оценок эффективности деятельности сложных производственных систем. Научные доклады № 25(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 24(R)–2006
С.В. Кошелева. Особенности командно-ролевого взаимодействия менеджеров среднего и высшего звена  международной и российских компаний. Научные доклады № 24(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 23(R)–2006
А.В. Бухвалов, Ю.Б. Ильина, О.В. Бандалюк. Электронное корпоративное управление и проблемы раскрытия информации: сравнительное пилотное исследование. Научные доклады № 23(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 22(R)–2006
Д.Л. Волков, Т.А. Гаранина. Оценивание интеллектуального капитала российских компаний. Научные доклады № 22(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 21(R)–2006
Т.Е. Андреева. Организационные изменения в российских компаниях: результаты эмпирического исследования. Научные доклады № 21(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 20(R)–2006
Nicolay Zenkevich, Leon Petrosjan. Time-consistency of cooperative solutions. Discussion Paper #20(E)–2006. Saint Petersburg State University: St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
#19(E)–2006
Tatiana Andreeva. Organizational change in Russian companies: Findings from research project. Discussion Paper #19(E)–2006. Saint Petersburg State University: St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 18(R)–2006
А.Д. Чанько. Алгебра и гармония HR-менеджмента. Эффективность обучения персонала и диагностика организационной культуры. Научные доклады № 18(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 17(R)–2006
Е.К. Завьялова. Взаимосвязь организационной культуры и систем мотивации и стимулирования персонала. Научные доклады № 17–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 16(R)–2006
А.А. Румянцев, Ю.В. Федотов. Экономико-статистический анализ результатов инновационной деятельности в промышленности Санкт-Петербурга. Научные доклады № 16(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 15(R)–2006
С.В. Кошелева. Удовлетворенность трудом как комплексный диагностический показатель организационных проблем в управлении персоналом. Научные доклады № 15(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 14(R)–2006
Е.К. Завьялова. Особенности профессионально-личностного потенциала и развития карьеры линейных менеджеров отечественных производственных предприятий. Научные доклады № 14(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 13(R)–2006
Л.Н. Богомолова. Применение этнографических методов для изучения процессов принятия потребительских решений. Научные доклады № 13(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 12(R)–2006
А.Е. Лукьянова, Т.Г. Тумарова. Хеджевые фонды как инструменты снижения рисков и роста ценности компании. Научные доклады № 12(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#11(E)–2006
Galina Shirokova. Strategies of Russian Companies at the Different Stages of Organizational Life-Cycle: the Attempt of Empirical Analysis. Discussion Paper #11(E)–2006. Institute of Management, Saint Petersburg State University: St.Petersburg, 2006.
 
#10(E)–2006
Tatyana Andreeva., Victoria Chaika. Dynamic capabilities: what they need to be dynamic' Discussion Paper #10(E)–2006. Institute of Management, Saint Petersburg State University: St. Petersburg, 2006.
 
№ 9(R)–2006
Е.А.Дорофеев, О.А. Лапшина. Облигации с переменным купоном: принципы ценообразования. Научные доклады № 9(R)–2006. СПб.: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 8(R)–2006
Н.А. Зенкевич, Л.А. Петросян. Временная состоятельность кооперативных решений. Научные доклады № 8(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 7(R)–2006
А.Н. Козырев. Экономика интеллектуального капитала. Научные доклады № 7(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 6(R)–2006
Д.В. Овсянко, В.А. Чайка. Особенности организации процесса непрерывного улучшения качества в российских компаниях и его связь с процессами стратегического поведения. Научные доклады № 6(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 5(R)–2006
Г.В. Широкова. Стратегии российских компаний на разных стадиях жизненного цикла: попытка эмпирического анализа. Научные доклады № 5(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 4(R)–2006
С.А. Вавилов, К.Ю. Ермоленко. Управление инвестиционным портфелем на финансовых рынках в рамках подхода, альтернативного стратегии самофинансирования. Научные доклады № 4(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 3(R)–2006
Д.Л. Волков, И.В. Березинец. Управление ценностью: анализ основанных на бухгалтерских показателях моделей оценки. Научные доклады № 3(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
№ 2(R)–2006
Т.Е. Андреева, В.А. Чайка. Динамические способности фирмы: что необходимо, чтобы они были динамическими. Научные доклады № 2(R)–2006. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006.
 
#1(E)–2006
Iryna Merkuryeva. The Structure and Determinants of Informal Employment in Russia: Evidence from NOBUS Data. Discussion Paper #1(E)–2006. Institute of Management, St.Petersburg State University: St.Petersburg, 2006.


   

2005 год

 
№ 2(R)–2005
В.М. Полтерович, О.Ю. Старков. Создание массовой ипотеки в России: проблема трансплантации. Научные доклады № 2(R)–2005. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2005.
 
№ 1(R)–2005
А.В. Бухвалов, Д.Л. Волков. Фундаментальная ценность собственного капитала: использование в управлении компанией. Научные доклады № 1(R)–2005. СПб: НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2005.